Jack Ketch: Bodgy Axeman
There can hardly be a more fascinating dramatis personae in London’s rich story than that of the Restoration. Aside from the king himself, we have playwrights, diarists, scientists, architects, building developers, projectors, wheeler-dealers of every stripe. Everybody striving, but striving in a general atmosphere of paranoia and fear. For the issues which dominated this highly politicised, religious and violent of centuries still persisted.
And so we come the legal profession, which was kept extremely busy. Dozens of barristers making a name for themselves either defending or prosecuting Catholics and recusants, in fact anyone straying from the restored Anglican orthodoxy. From Judge Jeffreys at the pinnacle wielding terrible justice to the prisoners at the bottom. On the rung barely just above them, their own gaolers and executioners. Most notorious of these was Jack Ketch (unknown – 1686). Sometimes referred to John, his surname frequently rendered as “Catch”, his onomatopoeic moniker quickly became the stuff of legend, invoked even by frustrated parents as a warning to miscreant toddlers.
Even though Ketch was a public executioner almost continuously between 1666 and 1678, his background remains a mystery. Date of birth unknown, it’s thought that he came from Ireland. It is known that he lived near Grey’s Inn Road and was buried in Clerkenwell in 1686, predeceasing his wife, Katherine.
With at least eight public executions a year, at Tyburn and elsewhere in the capital, it is certain that Ketch would have despatched hundreds of prisoners, almost all by hanging. Those who were found guilty of treason were also drawn and quartered at his hand. The heads of traitors, as was the custom, were displayed on London Bridge, Temple Bar and other notable landmarks. The corpses of many prisoners who were not quartered, were instead gibbeted, that is to say displayed in a cage which was hung up near busy roadways. In order to make body parts and corpses last longer, the executioner would first immerse them in boiling pitch. Ketch did this at his headquarters in Newgate Prison which hence became known as Jack Ketch’s Kitchen.
Executioner is a macabre profession in any age, and there were many over the years, so why did Ketch become so notorious? First, there was his longevity in the job. Second, he was known to be unpleasant, and very frequently extremely drunk, on and off the job. Third, he was avaricious. He was constantly in dispute with the authorities over payment for quartering and “boylinge” of the bodies. A further stream of revenue, it was customary for the executioner to keep the clothes of the condemned, often very fancy in the case of the wealthy, people preferred to look their best en route to the scaffold. But in addition, the prisoner would often bribe the executioner with as much as he could afford, to despatch him as painlessly and quickly as possible. Ketch was known to milk this particular system in full. One has to wonder, therefore, how he ended up doing a spell in the Marshalsea for debt.
After 1678, Ketch continued to work as an executioner until his death and it’s from this period that almost certainly he derives his notoriety, in particular for his appalling incompetence in the beheadings of William, Lord Russell in 1683 for the Rye House Plot; and the Duke of Monmouth in 1685 for his failed attempt on the throne itself. Beheadings during this period were relatively few, reserved for the high-born only. In earlier times it was customary to engage a specialist, often from the Continent, to do the job. Ketch had no experience as an axe-wielder and so he proved. In the case of Lord Russell, despite being given between ten and thirty guineas (accounts vary) to do a good job, he took at least three blows to sever the noble’s head, the first of which struck Russell on the shoulder! Some say Ketch had been deliberately vindictive, others that he was blind drunk. Perhaps he was both.
Two years later it was Monmouth’s turn. The Duke gave Ketch six guineas with a promise of more from his servant after the act and demanded that he do a better job this time:
Do not serve me as you did my Lord Russel. I have heard you struck him three or four times…
In vain. Ketch took a least five strikes this time. Halfway through he cast down his axe in frustration and was ordered to continue. In the end, he had to finish the task with a knife. The crowd were up in arms. The diarist John Evelyn wrote:
five Chopps … so incens’d the people, that had he not ben guarded & got away they would have torne him to pieces.
A year later, Ketch himself was dead.
But his fame was well established in his own time. Poems, ballads, pamphlets, broadsheets, essays abounded, all laced with hefty dollops of black humour, irony and sarcasm. Within a generation he was resurrected, reinvented as the hangman in Punch and Judy shows, the one whom Mr Punch tricks into hanging himself.
Sources:
Wikipedia, as per.
Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (sub required), profile by Tim Wales
Newgate: London’s Prototype of Hell by Stephen Halliday
My father told us about him. Have read about him in a few books. Have enjoyed this what you have written.
Loved this. My father told me about him when I was a child.
This is a very good post, Mike. The Restoration happens to be my speciality. I have a two part article on the Popish Plot on the History in an Hour website if you are interested, something I wrote last autumn. Just Google England and the Popish Plot-History in an Hour.
Thanks. It is a crowded space, and rightly so. I have drifted into it quite recently having been reading Ade Tinniswood and Leo Hollis. I’ll look out for your thing on HiaH. I promised Rupert some items too, but so far have been too busy to knuckle down to it.
Hi Mike, you mentioned that it is thought that Jack Ketch came from Ireland. I wonder if you have a reference for this? The only reference I could find was on wikipedia. It was added by user 62.56.51.147 on 16 November 2007 after he visited Madame Tussauds. He did not give a citation.
I couldn’t find any mention of it in either the Encyclopedia Brittanica entry for him, which explicitly mentions that he is English; or the Dictionary of National Biography entry (Vol 31), which is extensive about his time as executioner, but silent about his earlier life ( see http://archive.org/stream/dictionarynatio47stepgoog#page/n84/mode/2up )
Thomas Seccombe, the author of the entry in the Dictionary of National Biography, was the author of a biography entitled “Life of John Ketch, executioner”, but I’ve been unable to lay my hands on it.
I wonder if you have a reference earlier than 16 November 2007 for this?
Hi Breandán, thanks for this. I must have picked it up off Wiki too, I don’t think mentioned in the other sources I cite. Did this nearly two years ago, so a bit hazy now. I have not idea how good or otherwise Madame Tussauds’s research is, I wouldn’t cast aspersions. But I have seen how an original erroneous source can be picked up and spread (as I am perhaps guilty of doing here). I think we should be better served treating him as “origins uncertain” unless someone (you?) can tease out something more convincing.
I’m reading Lady Antonia Fraser’s Charles 11. Really good. Wow they were brutal times!But fascinating to learn about our history.
A week or so ago I found on line a video which considered Jack Ketch’s botched executions.
The axe kept in a museum (Tower of London?) that purported to be the one used for these executions was examined first by an archaeologist and then by a traditional blacksmith.
Their first comment that it was carpenter’s axe and not really suitable for beheadings and secondly that the blade was out of true.
The blacksmith made an accurate replica. The archaeologist then tried it out on a rolled up straw mat which would have roughly the same consistency as a human neck. They tied two bands of red tape round the bundle to signify the length of a human neck and the archaeologist attempted to cut the bundle with the axe between the markers. In spite of him being strong, fit with normal eyesight and used to handling tools (as an archaeologist must be) his blow was wildly out, missing the markers by a fair margin. Indeed they estimated that had the Archaeologist been attempting to cut off a human head, he would have hit the base of the skull, just as Jack Ketch is reputed to have done with Russell and Monmouth.
They concluded that Ketch’s axe was not “fit for purpose”. Thus some of the blame attached to Ketch the Bungler is unjustified. Of course, if Ketch had been more experience, more intelligent, less drunk &c he might have realised after the first blow that the axe was “throwing” and adjusted his aim accordingly, and demanded a replacement tool for the next beheading. But it is easy to be wise after the event/experiment.
I found this reconstruction fascinating. Unfortunately I did not note down the website and I have failed to find it again either in my computer’s “History” section or via Google. My impression was that it was a quite old BBC/OU documentary.